Saturday, June 22, 2024
HomeLatest NewsEntertainmentSC begins hearing suo motu notice on IHC judges' letter

SC begins hearing suo motu notice on IHC judges’ letter

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court docket Wednesday started the listening to of its suo motu discover taken on the letter written by Islamabad Excessive Court docket (IHC) judges that cites complaints of interference in judicial affairs by intelligence companies.

The listening to is being carried out by a seven-member SC bench headed by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa and comprising six different judges — Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhel, Justice Athar Minallah, Justice Musarrat Hilali and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan.

The SC is conducting dwell proceedings of the listening to.

Legal professional Normal for Pakistan Mansoor Usman Awan has begun his arguments within the matter. The SC has despatched a discover for him to seem earlier than the bench.

Earlier this week, the SC took suo motu discover of the matter after round 300 attorneys, belonging to numerous bar associations throughout the nation, signed a petition demanding CJP Isa to train the apex courtroom’s suo motu jurisdiction underneath Article 184(3) of the Structure on the letter.

The attorneys additionally rejected the formation of an inquiry fee led by former chief justice of Pakistan Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jilani to probe the allegations.

It was learnt that the chief justice had referred the matter to a judges’ committee — comprising himself and three senior most judges of the apex courtroom underneath the Supreme Court docket (Follow and Process) Act 2023 — for deliberation and structure of a bench for listening to the matter.

The committee later determined to train suo motu jurisdiction underneath Article 184(3) of the Structure and repair the matter for listening to on April 3.

Letter by IHC judges

On March 25, six judges of Islamabad Excessive Court docket (IHC) had demanded Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Qazi Faez Isa to convene the Judicial Conference to think about the matter of interference of intelligence operatives within the judicial capabilities or intimidation of judges in a fashion that undermined independence of the judiciary.

The IHC judges, together with Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Justice Babar Sattar, Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir, Justice Tariq Mahmood Jehangiri, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan and Justice Saman Rifat Imtiaz, wrote a letter to the chief justice, who can also be the chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC).

After the letter went viral and contemplating the gravity of allegations it talked about, the chief justice known as a gathering the identical day with the IHC chief justice and all of the judges after Iftar at 8pm at his residence throughout which the considerations of all of the judges had been heard individually.

The next day, on March 27, the CJP met with the attorney-general and the legislation minister, and thereafter, the chief justice and the senior puisne choose met with the president of Supreme Court docket Bar Affiliation (SCBA) and the senior most member of the Pakistan Bar Council in Islamabad.

A full-court assembly of all of the SC judges, known as underneath the chairmanship of the chief justice of Pakistan at 4pm the identical day, deliberated on the problems raised within the letter.

The total-court developed a consensus by majority that the chief justice could maintain a gathering with the prime minister of and lift the difficulty with him. CJP Isa then met with Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif within the Supreme Court docket the place he clearly said that interference by the chief within the affairs and judicial workings of judges won’t be tolerated.

Throughout the assembly, structure of an inquiry fee was proposed underneath the Pakistan Commissions of Inquiry Act, 2017. The prime minister absolutely endorsed the views expressed by the CJP and senior puisne choose and guaranteed them that he will likely be taking different applicable measures to make sure an Prime Time News24 judiciary.

After additional consultations among the many CJP and different judges in addition to the federal authorities’s actions on this regard, the announcement of a one-man inquiry fee comprising former CJP Tassaduq Hussain Jillani was made, who recused himself from the chance, citing numerous constitutional causes.

Extra to observe…



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments